OATH violation points
A Brooklyn restaurant entered the matter with 52 violation points at issue. After review and challenges to assessed violations, the cited case outcome was reduced to 19 points.
Selected examples from Grade A Rescue engagements show how we approach enforcement risk: isolate the issue, organize the evidence, correct the operation, and move the case toward the next defensible outcome.
A Brooklyn restaurant entered the matter with 52 violation points at issue. After review and challenges to assessed violations, the cited case outcome was reduced to 19 points.
In a Manhattan closure engagement, corrective action was organized immediately and the restaurant reported reopening in two business days.
Grade A Rescue’s published track record reflects hundreds of restaurant engagements across New York City’s five boroughs.
These examples reflect specific client engagements and published client accounts. Outcomes vary based on inspection findings, evidence, compliance history, agency action, and the facts of each matter. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Strong casework is not a stack of photographs dropped into a PDF. It is a timeline: what was cited, what was observed, what was corrected, what evidence exists, who performed the correction, and what the governing requirement actually says.
That discipline applies whether the matter is a mock inspection, an OATH hearing, a corrective action plan, or an emergency reopening.
Violation codes, temperatures, cited conditions, photographs, inspection paperwork, and operational context.
Invoices, service reports, updated procedures, staff actions, repairs, and evidence showing what changed.
Hearing dates, submissions, affidavits, decisions, open tasks, and next actions kept organized in one workflow.